On my way home the other day, I listened briefly to a talk show on Christian radio. I don’t know if the conversation started with AI as the topic, but it had gotten there by the time I turned the radio on.
In Christian circles, and particularly in the professional side of it (preachers, teachers, song writers), there is an aversion towards AI. For instance, there is something creepy about thinking that a machine created a whole worship song – lyrics, melody, and even a full “recording” of it with full instrumentals. How can a machine create a song that connects the human soul with the eternal and spiritual God? What does a computer know about loving God? How can you trust that? And how can you trust AI with a sermon? Who wants to hear Pastor Bob read a sermon written by a machine called “Grok?” Even if Elon Musk owns it? Who wants to participate in a Bible Study generated by ChatGPT?
On this radio show, the host confessed that he had accidentally used AI in answering somebody’s question, but it was only because “Gemini” gave the correct answer when he googled something, and it had come up first. He was apologetic, like he had brushed up against pornography or something. Is it that bad?
I use AI for research. Now, the purest form of research is to run experiments in the field. Ask the question “do people back into parking spaces more now than 50 years ago?” Then, formulate a hypothesis: “People back into parking spaces more now than 50 years ago.” Then, go to an old Publix, count how many do, and then find a picture of that Publix 50 years ago, and compare. Research at its purest. Next down on the ladder, you go old-school and go to a library and look for someone who has done that research. Maybe use the inter-library loan to get the book you need. Or, next down the research lazy ladder, you just Google it, and start reading through the (most often) first page of hits and decide for yourself. The easiest route is to ask AI. I’ll leave that to you.
Now, back in the day, when I used inter-library loan, I might have a theological question and go to the library. I might find a book written by an internationally recognized scholar. Does that mean I would get the right answer? What if that author was Friedrich D. E. Schleiermacher? First, you wouldn’t understand the answer, and second, it likely would be wrong. What if a now disgraced preacher wrote the praise song? Is it wrong now? My point is, AI is not the only source of potential mistruth.
And if, for sermons, we are going to only rely on a bunch of pastors confusing inspiration from God with the Saturday night desperation of nothing yet to say for Sunday, we’re all in trouble. Everything we think, everything we believe, everything we say needs to be placed against the backdrop of Scripture with the prayerful blessing of the Holy Spirit. When a thought, when a line from a hymn, a point in a sermon matches up with Scripture, then we can trust it. And I think we can trust it whether it comes from field work, reading a book, googling it, or yes, even asking AI.
I was taught way back in college that “all truth is God’s truth.” It matters not where I found it, or who articulated it, if it’s true, it is Godly. And I can trust it. Spiritual truths are only those that line up with Scripture. That is our testing ground.
We need to know it well!
Looking towards the Word,
Craig
Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth. John 17:17 (NIV)
